<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eudie tuesday &#187; why lawd why?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eudietuesday.com/tag/why-lawd-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com</link>
	<description>in search of culture and collagen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

		<item>
		<title>Today in Kim Kardashian: A Rundown of All Things Sad, Bad, &amp; Ridiculous</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/11/today-in-kim-kardashian-a-rundown-of-all-things-sad-bad-ridiculous/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=today-in-kim-kardashian-a-rundown-of-all-things-sad-bad-ridiculous</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/11/today-in-kim-kardashian-a-rundown-of-all-things-sad-bad-ridiculous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=3139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on XfinityTV.com. Since it took Kim Kardashian a mere 72 days to back out of her marriage with Kris Humphries, we kinda wanted her to back out of the spotlight for at least 72 days — because we’re dying for a break from all this Kardashian Krap-to-strophic drama. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3140" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3140" title="kim_k" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/kim_k.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Lisa Maree Williams/Getty Images</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/blogs/2011/keeping-up-with-the-kardashians/today-in-kim-kardashian-a-rundown-of-all-things-sad-bad-ridiculous/" target="_blank">XfinityTV.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>Since it took <strong>Kim Kardashian</strong> a mere 72 days to back out of her marriage with <strong>Kris Humphries</strong>, we kinda wanted her to back out of the spotlight for at least 72 days — because we’re dying for a break from all this Kardashian Krap-to-strophic drama.</p>
<p>But considering Kimmie’s first love is her career, that’s just silly wishful thinking…</p>
<p><em><strong>Check out the latest ups and downs in the Kardashian post-divorce announcement soap opera:</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>Loyalty deserves a self-indulgent kiss from a perfectly bronzed goddess.</strong> Thanking her “loyal blog dolls” for being so supportive amid her “divorce crisis” (a.k.a. brain-freeze crisis), Kim offers her “fans” a “generous” gift: a picture of her blowing a kiss. (Uhh, yeah. We think they’d prefer some of that $18 million wedding loot, or—like one commenter notes—some re-gifting from her expensive-arse wedding gifts.)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/11/kim-kardashian-blows-kiss.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nymag%2Fvulture+%28Vulture+-+nymag.com%27s+Entertainment+and+Culture+Blog%29" target="_self">Vulture</a>.<span id="more-3139"></span></p>
<p><strong>Kim’s Lawyer Swears Marriage the Real Deal.</strong> Celebrified attorney <strong>Laura Wasser</strong>, who’s usually hush-hush about the legal issues of her A-list clientele, went on the record saying she has no reason to believe that Kim and Kris’ marriage was fake. (Wait. She’s a lawyer…we’re supposed to believe her?)</p>
<p>“Our office did indeed negotiate and prepare a prenup for Ms. Kardashian,” Wasser says. Given what I know regarding that document, it is not plausible that this marriage was a sham.”</p>
<p>She adds that the purported 30-page prenup involved financial issues “that go well into the future,” which, to her, was an indicator that the marriage wasn’t a get-rich-quick scheme.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/11/15/kim-kardashian-lawyer-laura-wasser-prenup-marriage-real/#.TsK-IfGiLu2" target="_self">TMZ</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Kim’s Hairy Situation.</strong> Never mind the divorce, Kim’s in the crosshairs of another legal matter: She’s being sued by a hair-removal company called Radiancy. In the lawsuit, the company claims Kim has been misleading the public by making false—and dangerous—statements about the efficacy of a rival hair-removal product by a company called TRIA.</p>
<p>Radiancy points out that Kim went on “The Wendy Williams Show” claiming she uses TRIA’s product “on her entire body,” even though TRIA admits the product isn’t safe to use on the face, neck, ears, and private parts.</p>
<p>In addition, Radiancy states that after becoming its new spokesperson, Kim had only been using the TRIA product for a few weeks before she hastily tweeted she was “loving the results so far.” (The product claims results begin after 90 days.)</p>
<p>Radiancy is requesting that Kim and TRIA stop their false advertising and is seeking moolah for losing business over the matter.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/kim-kardashian-sued-over-hair-removal-product-32778" target="_self">TheWrap</a>.</p>
<p><strong>A Signature Ending. </strong>To Kim’s relief, Kris plans on signing divorce papers—with no drama attached.</p>
<p>However, according to onlookers, who recently saw him with friends at NYC’s Serafina’s (one of his fave hangouts with his soon-to-be ex-wife), he was looking like a forlorn, heartbroken giant.</p>
<p>“Kris looked so depressed,” said one source. “He looked like he was going to cry in his pizza, sat at the same table he used to sit with Kim.”</p>
<p>Awww. But perhaps there were just too many onions on his pie…</p>
<p>Sources: <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/sad-and-gloomy-kris-humphries-back-in-nyc-20111511?utm_source=dailynewsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=newsletter" target="_self">Us Weekly</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20545461,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+people%2Fheadlines+%28PEOPLE.com%3A+Top+Headlines%29" target="_self">People</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/11/today-in-kim-kardashian-a-rundown-of-all-things-sad-bad-ridiculous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fiscal Facts: Kim Kardashian Made $18 Million on Wedding</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/08/the-fiscal-facts-kim-kardashian-made-18-million-on-wedding/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-fiscal-facts-kim-kardashian-made-18-million-on-wedding</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/08/the-fiscal-facts-kim-kardashian-made-18-million-on-wedding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on XfinityTV.com. Kim Kardashian is a taken woman. The 30-year-old uber reality starlet said “I do” to 26-year-old New Jersey Nets forward Kris Humphries in a wedding Saturday that embodied a trifecta of what the famous family represents: extravagance, celebrity friends, and most of all, endorsement deals. In fact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2952" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2952" title="Kardashian-Kris" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Kardashian-Kris.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Getty Images</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/blogs/2011/tv-news/the-fiscal-facts-kim-kardashian-made-18-million-on-wedding/" target="_blank">XfinityTV.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>Kim Kardashian is a taken woman. The 30-year-old <em>uber</em> reality starlet said “I do” to 26-year-old New Jersey Nets forward Kris Humphries in a wedding Saturday that embodied a trifecta of what the famous family represents: extravagance, celebrity friends, and most of all, endorsement deals.</p>
<p>In fact, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/wedding_casher_kim_Zm0nCJMMp6UgUlEiSGpWKO" target="_self">The New York Post</a> reports that Kim raked in — not spent — $18 million for publicizing her nuptials. Considering the event has been estimated at a cost of $10 million, it looks like it’s another Kardashian first: Making a huge profit rather than going into debt on what’s supposed to be one of the priciest rites of passage. (Maybe Momager Kris should work for Congress.)</p>
<p><strong>In case you just woke up, here’s a fiscal round-up via the Post on how Kimmie got away with barely paying for the punch bowls:<span id="more-2951"></span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Payments they received</strong><br />
* $15 million plus profit for four-hour, two-part wedding special on <em>E!</em><br />
* $2.5 million for exclusive photos with <em>People</em> magazine<br />
* $300,000 for exclusive engagement announcement with <em>People</em><br />
* $100,000 for exclusive rights to bridal shower with Britain’s <em>OK!</em> mag<br />
* $50,000 to have bachelorette party at Tao in Las Vegas</p>
<p><strong>Stuff they got for free</strong><br />
* $15,000 to $20,000 Hansen’s Bakery wedding cake<br />
* $20,000 Vera Wang wedding dress and fittings<br />
* $40,000 for two more Vera Wang evening dresses<br />
* $400,000 in Perrier Jouet Champagne<br />
* $150,000 in hair and makeup for photo shoots and TV “home video”<br />
* $10,000 in Lehr &amp; Black wedding invitations</p>
<p><strong>Deeply discounted</strong><br />
* $2 million 20.5-carat engagement ring and $1 million wedding bands by jeweler Lorraine Schwartz. The amount they paid for these items hasn’t been revealed, but it’s much less than their worth.</p>
<p>We can’t help but think that somewhere in the deep recesses of her famous-for-being-famous soul, Paris Hilton is whimpering.</p>
<p><em>E!</em> will air some footage from Kim and Kris’ wedding tonight at 6 p.m/5c. The two-part special, “Kim’s Fairytale Wedding: A Kardashian Event,” will air Oct. 9 and 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/08/the-fiscal-facts-kim-kardashian-made-18-million-on-wedding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snooki Wants An Empire Like Jessica Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/03/snooki-wants-an-empire-like-jessica-simpson/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=snooki-wants-an-empire-like-jessica-simpson</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/03/snooki-wants-an-empire-like-jessica-simpson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. “Jersey Shore’s” Nicole ‘Snooki’ Polizzi is on the cover of the new issue of Rolling Stone. Question: Has someone at the mag been eating paint chips? Yes, indeed, the pint-size pouf-head’s stardom has blasted off into another galaxy (actually, we think it created another galaxy), and whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="PostContent">
<div id="attachment_2532" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2532" title="snooki-rolling-stone" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/snooki-rolling-stone.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Rolling Stone</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2011/tv-news/snooki-wants-an-empire-like-jessica-simpson/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>“Jersey Shore’s” Nicole ‘Snooki’ Polizzi is on the cover of the new issue of <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/snooki-discusses-smushing-and-the-stress-of-jersey-shore-in-rolling-stone-cover-story-20110302" target="_self"><em>Rolling Stone</em></a>. Question: <em>Has someone at the mag been eating paint chips? </em></p>
<p>Yes, indeed, the pint-size pouf-head’s stardom has blasted off into  another galaxy (actually, we think it created another galaxy), and  whether you like it or not, contributing editor Erik Hedegaard delves  into how Snook’ems started out as a small town New York party girl  aspiring to be a vet tech assistant to the mega-rich reality star that  she is.</p>
<p>Because the Orange Oompa Loompa is ever so quotable, we picked out our favorites from the <em>Rolling Stone</em> interview right here:<span id="more-2530"></span></p>
<p><strong>On Her “Jersey Shore” Audition:</strong><br />
“I was wearing leggings and a fur  coat, and I walked in like I was hot  sh-t, because I always think I’m hot  sh-t, and I had my big pouf, and  they were like, ‘What is that?’”</p>
<p><strong>On Why She Thinks She’s So Popular:</strong><br />
“I say what’s on my mind, and I’m real. And I’m tan.”</p>
<p><strong>On Watching Herself on the Tube:</strong><br />
“If I do something stupid, which is pretty much the whole time, I hate  it. Obviously, they’re only going to put the good stuff in, and the good  stuff is us drunk, so all I’m seeing is me drunk and falling down.  That’s how I am when I party. But some of the stuff I do is, like,  ‘Really, Nicole?’ I look like a freakin’ alcoholic. I’m like, ‘You’re  sweating, your makeup is running, you look gross.’ I just look like  sh-t.”</p>
<p><strong>On Her Aspirations:</strong><br />
“I’d like to turn out like Jessica Simpson, with her whole brand. She makes millions.”</p>
<p><strong>On How to Avoid the Cameras:</strong><br />
“The only time we’re not on camera is when we’re in the shower, and  that’s why we all take three-hour showers, just to get away from it.  Another reason is, if you masturbate, you probably only do it in the  shower. Otherwise, you’d know that people are looking at you. That’s  awkward.”</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/03/snooki-wants-an-empire-like-jessica-simpson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, They Worked It: The Kardashians Made $65 Mil Last Year</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/02/oh-they-worked-it-the-kardashians-made-65-mil-last-year/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oh-they-worked-it-the-kardashians-made-65-mil-last-year</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/02/oh-they-worked-it-the-kardashians-made-65-mil-last-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. We were already convinced that Kim Kardashian’s colossal backside buttercups—and her ability to shake them into moneymakers—were the eighth wonder of the world, but when word got out via The Hollywood Reporter that she and the rest of her famous-for-being-famous reality clan grossed a whopping $65 million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="PostContent">
<div id="attachment_2497" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2497" title="Karadash" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Karadash.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for IMG</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2011/tv-news/oh-they-worked-it-the-kardashians-made-65k-last-year/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>We were already convinced that Kim Kardashian’s  colossal backside buttercups—and her ability to shake them into  moneymakers—were the eighth wonder of the world, but when word got out  via <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-kardashians-made-65-million-100349">The Hollywood Reporter</a> that she and the rest of her famous-for-being-famous reality clan  grossed a whopping $65 million last year, three words exploded from our  mouths: What da <em>hell-age</em>?!?!</p>
<p>Self-proclaimed “momager” Kris Jenner, who takes a 10% cut for her  services, explains her family’s fortune in this way: “We’re just this  big family with a lot of drama and a lot of issues, and there’s someone  here for everyone to relate to.”<span id="more-2495"></span></p>
<p>And that “relating to” to the masses seems to be the Kardashian manifesto for raking in the dough.</p>
<p>Check out some of the silliest and outrageous ways uncensored reality  siblings Kourt, Khloe, and Kim have helped make their fam into an  entertainment phenom.</p>
<p><strong>- Tweet-le Dang!</strong> Kim charges companies up to $25K per tweet to mention their products on her Twitter page.</p>
<p><strong>- Acc-sexorize.</strong> Silly Bandz recently came out with a  Kardashian Glam Pack for those who’ve been dying to wear the famous  sisters’ lips and bodily curves on their wrists! (Makes no sense to us,  but just go with it! The Kardashians did.)</p>
<p><strong>- The Bootylicious in the Flesh.</strong> If you want Kim to  come to your party, she’ll be happy to stop by—at a fee of $100K –  $250K. But that’s just a domestic figure. For those of you who live  abroad, she might charge up to $1 mill.</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>- For Beauty Fiends Who Can’t Google.</strong> Lifestyle and beauty book <em>Kardashian Konfidential</em> became an overnight best seller—and why not? With unprecedented beauty  tips like slathering Vaseline once a week on ashy feet (thanks, Khlo!)  and putting your hands on your hips to make your chunky arms look  slimmer (aww, thanks, Kim!), you might just turn into a glamorous  Armenian princess yourself!</p>
<p><strong>- Post-Partum Depression…of the tummy that is.</strong> After  Kourt gave birth to lil Mason, she inked a deal to be the spokesperson  for Belly Bandit, a contraption that claims to shrink your  post-pregnancy muffin top.</p>
<p><strong>- What Happens in Vegas [Should Never Have Happened] in Vegas.</strong> The Mirage is opening the first-ever “celebrity destination” store  where you can find products that the Kardashians have endorsed (does  that include Vaseline?). Aside from newly incoming beach towels and  Kardashian bottled water, visitors will also be given hotel room keys  featuring images of the sisters and be able to work the slots with their  bronzed-out faces staring right at you! (We’ve officially moved from  Cheesy to Creepy Land.)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/02/oh-they-worked-it-the-kardashians-made-65-mil-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KLG and Hoda ‘Lose It’ on ‘Today’</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/01/klg-and-hoda-%e2%80%98lose-it%e2%80%99-on-%e2%80%98today%e2%80%99/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=klg-and-hoda-%25e2%2580%2598lose-it%25e2%2580%2599-on-%25e2%2580%2598today%25e2%2580%2599</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/01/klg-and-hoda-%e2%80%98lose-it%e2%80%99-on-%e2%80%98today%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. At 10 am on NBC this morning, millions of glutei maximi across America broke out into a guilt-ridden sweat when Hoda Kotb and Kathie Lee Gifford (KLG) hosted the entire Fourth Hour of &#8220;Today&#8221; on cycling machines, ellipticals, and treadmills! With calorie counters strapped to their bulging [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="PostContent">
<div id="attachment_2363" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2363" title="KLG-Hoda" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/KLG-Hoda.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">NBC</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2011/tv-news/klg-and-hoda-lose-it-on-today-while-brian-williams-eats-a-doughnut/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>At 10 am on NBC this morning, millions of glutei maximi across  America broke out into a guilt-ridden sweat when Hoda Kotb and Kathie  Lee Gifford (KLG) hosted the entire Fourth Hour of &#8220;Today&#8221; on cycling machines,  ellipticals, and treadmills!</p>
<p>With calorie counters strapped to their bulging biceps, the hosts  ushered in ‘Lose It With KLG and Hoda’ to help you kick off your New  Year’s work out resolutions and never say die! (Also, it was another way  for the dynamic duo to compete and antagonize each other.)<span id="more-2353"></span></p>
<p>Although we were disappointed that Hoda and KLG didn’t down a few  glasses of bubbly while working the machines, we went ahead and drank a  couple shots on Hoda’s behalf since she was flipping out on the fact she  was burning less calories than her shorter sidekick. But Hoda shouldn’t  feel so embarrassed; after all, she wasn’t the one wearing a SCRUNCHIE!  O.M.G., KLG. O.M.G.</p>
<p>Highlights included watching actor Seth Rogan cycle (and  giggle-heave) as he promoted his new movie, <em>The Green Hornet</em>, as well a  guest appearance by NBC “Nightly News” anchor Brian Williams  during the ladies’ elliptical segment. Stuffing his face with a powdered  jelly doughnut (we believe it was strawberry filling), Williams  spoketh: “We need to send a message, especially to young people, get  these machines and do this—it’s really important.” Then he finished his  morning treat and walked off the set. Such class, that man.</p>
<p>In between KLG’s various facial contortions and Hoda’s overly sweaty  face, another segment that was notable was when fitness expert Joy Bauer  joined the gals for a spin on the cycling machines and offered tips for  different diet personalities.</p>
<p><em>According to Joy’s Commandments, if  you’re a…</em><br />
<strong><br />
Multi-tasking Dieter:</strong> Pre-plan what you’re gonna eat and  prepare convenient go-to light foods. (Do marshmellows count as a light  food?)<br />
<strong>Commitment-Phobe Dieter: </strong>Reward yourself every fourth  day with non-food rewards, like Hoda’s new book! Oh, yeah!<br />
<strong>Sweets-aholic Dieter:</strong> Keep to a 90/10 food strategy,  meaning you can devote 10% of your daily diet to a sweet treat. Further  translation: You got 150 calories to work with. (Isn’t that like a  spoonful of Häagen-Dazs?)</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Did you enjoy watching KLG and Hoda sweat it out on your  flatscreens today? Did you feel the burn—or was that just your  conscience? Chime in!</strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2011/01/klg-and-hoda-%e2%80%98lose-it%e2%80%99-on-%e2%80%98today%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Housewife’ Danielle Staub Finds a Prince in ‘Social’</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/12/%e2%80%98housewife%e2%80%99-danielle-staub-finds-a-prince-in-%e2%80%98social%e2%80%99/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=%25e2%2580%2598housewife%25e2%2580%2599-danielle-staub-finds-a-prince-in-%25e2%2580%2598social%25e2%2580%2599</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/12/%e2%80%98housewife%e2%80%99-danielle-staub-finds-a-prince-in-%e2%80%98social%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Housewives of NJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. We wondered if Danielle Staub’s new reality hosting gig, succinctly titled &#8216;Social,&#8217; would quietly disintegrate like the outer ends of her eyebrows, but we were wrong. Radar Online has just released a clip of the show, which features the freshly fired &#8216;Real Housewives of New Jersey&#8217; villainess [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YWc8CYiGiUw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YWc8CYiGiUw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2010/tv-news/video-clip-danielle-staub-gets-social/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>We wondered if Danielle Staub’s new reality hosting gig, succinctly  titled &#8216;Social,&#8217; would quietly disintegrate like the outer ends of her  eyebrows, but we were wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/12/exclusive-video-photos-behind-scenes-with-danielle-staub-her-new-reality-show" target="_self">Radar Online</a> has just released a clip of the show,  which features the freshly fired &#8216;Real Housewives of New Jersey&#8217; villainess visiting  music producer/recording artist Prince Malik at his sprawling New York  estate. Due to the close facial proximity at which Staubzilla chatters  with the Prince, we suspect his aviators are super-glued to his face all  day for reasons other than trying to look cool … or maybe he’s just  secretly blind since he uses a Segway to get around his pad.<span id="more-2299"></span></p>
<p>As we reported earlier, &#8216;Social&#8217; is said to be a  modernized reinterpretation of &#8216;Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.&#8217; (And  based on what we’ve seen, ‘modernized reinterpretation’ may translate  as the ‘New Robin Leach’ attempting to leech off of her subjects.)</p>
<p>“I’m actually in talks with [Prince Malik] and his recording label,  so we’re in collaborations and we’re looking forward to a great future  together,” said the ‘Real Close’ singer about her new potential Sugar  Daddy.</p>
<p>&#8216;Social&#8217; is set to launch early next year.</p>
<p><strong>Do you think Staub-noxious has a hit on her hands? Would you  watch? And if you find out which channel WealthTV is on, please let us  know—because we have no idea.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/12/%e2%80%98housewife%e2%80%99-danielle-staub-finds-a-prince-in-%e2%80%98social%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food For Thought: What To Eat at New Reality Star-Themed Restaurant</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/11/food-for-thought-what-to-eat-at-new-reality-star-themed-restaurant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=food-for-thought-what-to-eat-at-new-reality-star-themed-restaurant</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/11/food-for-thought-what-to-eat-at-new-reality-star-themed-restaurant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=2238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. Does watching your favorite reality TV stars work up your appetite? (Yeah, we didn’t think so.) But hey, ‘The Spin Crowd’s Jonathan Cheban and Simon Huck are sure hoping that it does since they plan on opening the Reality Cafe on the Las Vegas Strip! (Is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2239" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 330px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2239" title="spin_crowd" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/spin_crowd.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="240" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Rex USA</p></div>
<div id="PostContent">
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2010/tv-news/food-for-thought-what-to-eat-at-new-reality-star-themed-restaurant/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>Does watching your favorite reality TV stars  work up your appetite? (Yeah, we didn’t think so.) But hey, ‘The Spin Crowd’s Jonathan Cheban and Simon Huck are  sure hoping that it does since they plan on opening the Reality Cafe on  the Las Vegas Strip! (Is that groaning we hear coming from your mouth or  your stomach?)</p>
<p>“Reality is here to stay and millions of people around the world love  their favorite reality stars as much as movie stars,” Cheban stated.  “Now they will be able to live, touch and eat their favorite reality  moments.”</p>
<p>In a joint statement via <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/kim-kardashians-bffs-to-open-reality-star-themed-restaurants-20101611" target="_self">UsMagazine.com</a>, the two PR reality stars (and old  pals of Kim Kardashian) announced that Reality Cafe will  mirror Hard Rock Cafe and Planet Hollywood and will include pop culture  memorabilia, along with dishes inspired by your fave reality TV stars.  One item already set to be on the menu: ‘Real Housewives of New Jersey’ Caroline Manzo’s meatballs. (We’re assuming the  accompanying sauce will be “thick as thieves.”)<span id="more-2238"></span></p>
<p>Unless we rent a bulldozer and hitchhike to Vegas, it seems this  opportunistic plan will carry through to <em>reality</em>, so it only  makes perfect sense that we resort to our imagination to cope.</p>
<p>Here’s our own list of delectable delights we hope to see on the  menu:</p>
<p><strong>- Dr. Drew’s Keep-It-Sober Smoothie (no alcohol)<br />
- We-Got-a-Situation Screwdriver<br />
- Heidi Klum-cumber Salad with Seal-samic Vinaigrette<br />
- Jessica Simpson Women-Can-Eat-Too Texas BBQ<br />
- Snooki’s Spray-on Orange Roasted Chicken w/Fried Pickles on the Side<br />
- Jake &amp; Vienna’s Much-Publicized-Banana Split (sprinkled w/nuts)<br />
- Pauly D’s Return-of-the-Mac &amp; Cheese<br />
- Speidi Humble Pie<br />
- Kardashians Want S’Mores Fame Special<br />
- Jennifer Grey Nose-Best Matzah Ball Soup<br />
- Flipped-Out Teresa Giudice Burger with a Side of Spicy Staubgoblin  Fries</strong></p>
<p><strong>What do you think of a reality stars-based restaurant? Would  you eat at Reality Cafe? What would you like to see on the menu?</strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/11/food-for-thought-what-to-eat-at-new-reality-star-themed-restaurant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why, Lawd, Why?! Pop Music Vault (2)</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art & music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second installment of atrocious pop songs originating from the annals of mine&#8217;s own tortured mind. Introducing White Lion&#8217;s &#8220;When the Children Cry&#8221; (1987). This is what Angelina Jolie sings to her brood before they go to bed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second installment of atrocious pop songs originating from the annals of mine&#8217;s own tortured mind. Introducing White Lion&#8217;s &#8220;When the Children Cry&#8221; (1987). This is what Angelina Jolie sings to her brood before they go to bed.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MHZ79InLGRY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MHZ79InLGRY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why, Lawd, Why?! Pop Music Vault (1)</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art & music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why lawd why?!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting a new lil series in my blog, which I&#8217;ve entitled the Why, Lawd, Why?! Pop Music Vault. This series represents random pop songs that make me feel obscenely gross&#8211;like when my kindergarten teacher, Mr. Ellenburg, forced me to eat cafeteria salad mixed with whole vitamin D milk. The lunch tray was lime green. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting a new lil series in my blog, which I&#8217;ve entitled the <em>Why, Lawd, Why?!</em> Pop Music Vault. This series represents random pop songs that make me feel obscenely gross&#8211;like when my kindergarten teacher, Mr. Ellenburg, forced me to eat cafeteria salad mixed with whole vitamin D milk. The lunch tray was lime green. (And yes, I barfed.) Yeah, that kind of gross.</p>
<p>So to start things off, I offer you Shana&#8217;s &#8220;I Want You&#8221; (1989). Three words: rocket science lyrics&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wapAh6zz4wQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wapAh6zz4wQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/why-lawd-why-pop-music-vault-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

