<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eudie tuesday &#187; health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eudietuesday.com/tag/health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com</link>
	<description>in search of culture and collagen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

		<item>
		<title>‘Thintervention With Jackie Warner’ vs. ‘Losing It With Jillian’: And the Difference Is?</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/09/%e2%80%98thintervention-with-jackie-warner%e2%80%99-vs-%e2%80%98losing-it-with-jillian%e2%80%99-and-the-difference-is/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=%25e2%2580%2598thintervention-with-jackie-warner%25e2%2580%2599-vs-%25e2%2580%2598losing-it-with-jillian%25e2%2580%2599-and-the-difference-is</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/09/%e2%80%98thintervention-with-jackie-warner%e2%80%99-vs-%e2%80%98losing-it-with-jillian%e2%80%99-and-the-difference-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=1979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article can also be found on Fancast.com. Starting this Monday get ready to take Jackie Warner very seriously. Because she definitely does, as indicated by the questionably low-rise biker shorts she’s been flaunting for her new Bravo weight-loss show ‘Losing It With Jackie’ ‘Thintervention’ (10pm ET). Unlike her previous show ‘Work Out’—which followed her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="PostContent">
<div id="attachment_1981" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1981" title="Thintervention" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Thintervention.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="260" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bravo</p></div>
<p><em>This article can also be found on <a href="http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2010/tv-news/%E2%80%98thintervention-with-jackie-warner%E2%80%99-vs.-%E2%80%98losing-it-with-jillian%E2%80%99-and-the-difference-is/" target="_blank">Fancast.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>Starting this Monday get ready to take Jackie Warner very seriously.  Because she definitely does, as indicated by the questionably low-rise  biker shorts she’s been flaunting for her new Bravo weight-loss show ‘Losing It With Jackie’ ‘Thintervention’ (10pm ET). Unlike her previous show  ‘Work Out’—which followed her career as a successful  gym owner, her roller coaster girlfriend issues, and the the personal  lives of her employees —’Thintervention’ focuses on Jackie’s mission to  transform both the spiritual and physical lives of eight chubby clients,  one of whom is former ‘Real’ Housewife of Orange County and <em>Playboy</em> Playmate Jeana Keough. <em>Meow.</em></p>
<p>Well, considering the premise of the fitness guru’s new stint, our  cleansed souls and svelte waistlines couldn’t help but feel a little bit  of déjà vu as we immediately likened it to Jillian Michaels’ NBC  spin-off ‘Losing It With Jillian,’ in which the fitness demon  makes house calls to change the unhappy lives of out-of-shape families  all across America.<span id="more-1979"></span></p>
<p>Aside from the fact that Jackie doesn’t scream as much as her shorter  counterpart, what exactly are the differences between the two shows? In  a conference call with reporters last week, we aimed to get the skinny  straight from the Horse’s Mouth on what makes her show unique and worth  watching.</p>
<p>Here are some of Jackie’s points in quotes—and just for kicks, how we  think Jillian would respond below:</p>
<p><strong>Jackie’s Show: She’s the Executive Producer</strong><br />
“I am an executive producer on the show. I’m in the editing bay almost  every day even to this point. And, you know, from the inception of the  show and to even at this end game at this state, I’m creatively  involved.”<br />
<em>Jillian’s Imaginary Response:</em> “Roll the credits—ditto!”</p>
<p><strong>Jackie’s Show: It’s Not Just About Weight Loss</strong><br />
“I’m really interested in dealing with that whole person. And I want  their life to be happier. I want their life to be more productive. I  want them to have a better quality of living, better interactions, a  stronger energy, self-esteem.”<br />
<em>Jillian’s Imaginary Response:</em> “I ain’t driving cross-country  and making house calls just so these folks could burn off a few packs of  Ding-Dongs. Oh, and in case you missed the episode: I changed the  attitude of an entire Apache tribe—bring it!”</p>
<p><strong>Jackie’s Show: Based on Her Program for Losing Weight</strong><br />
“This show is very unique to others because I used my book ‘This Is Why  You’re Fat,’ and that’s where the program came from.”<br />
<em>Jillian’s Imaginary Response:</em> “Ever heard of  JillianMichaels.com?”</p>
<p><strong>Jackie’s Show: The Clients Are in Their Natural Environment </strong><br />
“They’re not sequestered. They’re really taking the tools that our team  gives them and they have to apply them in their real lives. And that’s  the challenge and that emotional upheaval that that can cause trying to  get this pretty big weight loss goal in a short period of time.”<br />
<em>Jillian’s Imaginary Response:</em> “Dude, I share Snuggies and watch  TV in my freakin’ PJs in these folks’ living rooms…and then I sleep in  Bobby’s old room. Capice?”</p>
<p><strong>Jackie’s Show: Therapy</strong><br />
“We’re the only show that offers therapy, a real live therapy session,  you know, group therapy.”<br />
<em>Jillian’s Imaginary Response:</em> “Touche, Jackie. Touche. But when  my clients look into my eyes and see my enraged flaring nostrils, they  know I AM THEIR THERAPY, Woman!”</p>
<p>Now that you’ve been informed that ‘Thintervention’ is absolutely  nothing like ‘Losing It With Jillian,’ will you be tuning in? We  definitely will be, if not only to see if Jackie’s tacked on a hot  rockin’ theme song like Jilly’s.</p>
<p>The season premiere of ‘Thintervention’ airs Monday at 10pm (ET) on  Bravo.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2010/09/%e2%80%98thintervention-with-jackie-warner%e2%80%99-vs-%e2%80%98losing-it-with-jillian%e2%80%99-and-the-difference-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beauty Talk: Health Labels on Beauty Products</title>
		<link>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/beauty-talk-health-labels-on-beauty-products/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=beauty-talk-health-labels-on-beauty-products</link>
		<comments>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/beauty-talk-health-labels-on-beauty-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eudie Pak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eudietuesday.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008 New York introduced a mandate requiring fast food establishments to add calorie labels to their menus in an attempt to prevent us from growing massive muffin tops and half ton J-Lo’s. According to the assistant city commissioner’s findings, the labels are working. Ignorance sure is bliss, but when faced with the truth (e.g. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-893" title="eyeshadow_beautytalk" src="http://www.eudietuesday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/eyeshadow_beautytalk.jpg" alt="eyeshadow_beautytalk" width="241" height="362" />In 2008 New York introduced a mandate requiring fast food establishments to add calorie labels to their menus in an attempt to prevent us from growing massive muffin tops and half ton J-Lo’s. According to the assistant city commissioner’s <a title="findings" href="http://www.healthnews.com/nutrition-diet/calorie-count-labels-restaurant-menus-are-helping-consumers-make-better-choices-3801.html" target="_blank">findings</a>, the labels are working. Ignorance sure is bliss, but when faced with the truth (e.g. a thousand-calorie brownie a la mode), most people are shown to modify their behavior (split it at least!) and opt for healthier alternatives. So why can’t we get health labels on our personal care products?</p>
<p>As most of you probably already know, the FDA doesn’t invest its time regulating personal care products because it doesn’t believe they pose an immediate health risk. In other words, a <em>slow</em>, insidious poisoning of our bodies by the daily onslaught of man-made toxic chemicals hidden away in our body lotions, shampoos, cosmetics, perfumes, and deodorants<em> is</em> permissible.<span id="more-892"></span></p>
<p>If we had labels that scored the level of toxicity of our personal care products, my guess is that it’d prompt many of us to make healthier, greener choices and change our buying habits. Jolly good, right? For us, yes. For your collagen-plumping lip gloss company, not so much. Although some beauty companies have responded to consumers’ concerns, the vast majority of the billion-dollar industry has been seemingly reluctant to change, as doing so would require a massive overhaul of its formulations for less harmful ingredients&#8211;and lots of moolah coming out of its pocket. Sadly and infuriatingly, in this day and age the bottom line and the status quo muddy the progress towards greater consumer knowledge, choice, and most importantly, health. Sick, isn’t it?</p>
<p>On the bright side, I think the controversy is here to stay until there&#8217;s widespread accountability and regulation. Reputable sites like <a title="The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics" href="http://www.safecosmetics.org/section.php?id=51" target="_blank">The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics</a> and the <a title="Environmental Working Group’s cosmetic database" href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/index.php" target="_blank">Environmental Working Group’s cosmetic database</a> are really spreading the word that we don’t want to be guinea pigs to what some critics claim are innocuous ingredients. Hey, I’m all about testings things out but never at the expense of my health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eudietuesday.com/2009/12/beauty-talk-health-labels-on-beauty-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
